Throughout his campaign, Mamdani has remained deliberately vague about these measures. His latest decision to sidestep the topic during a recent campaign event has fueled frustration among City Council members who see his silence as politically calculated. Many believe he’s trying to avoid alienating progressive supporters while also keeping channels open with influential figures in New York’s real estate and business sectors.

Critics argue that Mamdani’s noncommittal approach reflects a broader pattern in his campaign — one marked by ambiguity and hesitation to take firm positions on divisive issues. His stance on housing, in particular, has drawn scrutiny after previous shifts in messaging about working with the private sector to tackle the city’s housing crisis.

Some of Mamdani’s fellow Democrats have also expressed concern. During meetings in Washington, D.C., earlier this year, he reportedly sought to reassure national party leaders of his electability and policy focus. Yet, his unwillingness to address the ballot measures directly may hinder efforts to solidify crucial endorsements ahead of the November election.

Despite the controversy, Mamdani’s campaign has gained momentum in recent weeks with the backing of two major labor unions, signaling that his grassroots appeal remains strong. Still, as the debate over the ballot measures heats up, his strategy of silence may prove risky. Whether he can maintain political balance — or if his evasiveness will alienate both allies and voters — remains one of the key questions shaping New York City’s mayoral race.